Difficult Passages

A Pastoral Reference
All Entries
10 Old Testament

The Binding of Isaac (The Aqedah)

Gen 22:1–19

The Difficulty

God commands Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham obeys without protest, binds Isaac, and raises the knife — only to be stopped by an angel. What kind of God demands child sacrifice? What kind of father complies? Kierkegaard called it the “teleological suspension of the ethical.”

Responses

Polemic Against Child Sacrifice

Tradition: Academic / Historical Summary: The whole point is that God doesn’t want child sacrifice — this is Israel’s definitive break with Canaanite practice.

The climactic moment is not the command but the substitution: God provides the ram. The message is: “Your God is not like the gods of the nations. He does not require your children. He provides.”

Strengths

  • Historically grounded in ANE context
  • The substitution motif becomes central to Israelite theology

Weaknesses

  • God still issues the command
  • The trauma of the test remains

Further Reading

  • Jon Levenson, The Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son (Yale, 1993) — essential
  • Gerhard von Rad, Genesis (OTL, 1972), on Genesis 22
  • Francesca Stavrakopoulou, King Manasseh and Child Sacrifice (De Gruyter, 2004)

Test of Faith / Obedience

Tradition: Traditional / Evangelical Summary: The story is about Abraham’s radical trust in God, even when God’s command contradicts God’s promise.

Abraham trusted that God would either provide an alternative or raise Isaac from the dead (Hebrews 11:19). The “test” (nissah, Gen 22:1) is about whether Abraham’s trust is absolute.

Strengths

  • Honors the text’s own framing
  • Rich in both Jewish and Christian tradition

Weaknesses

  • Can romanticize divine-commanded terror
  • May feel like a cop-out to someone who has experienced religious coercion

Further Reading

  • Hebrews 11:17–19 — the canonical Christian interpretation
  • Genesis Rabbah 56 — Midrashic expansion
  • R. W. L. Moberly, The Bible, Theology, and Faith (Cambridge, 2000)

The Trauma Reading / Ethical Protest

Tradition: Jewish / Philosophical Summary: The story is honestly horrifying; faithful reading means wrestling with it, not domesticating it.

Some Midrashic traditions say Isaac was traumatized. Sarah dies immediately after (Gen 23:1), possibly from shock. The text says Abraham went home but doesn’t mention Isaac going with him (22:19). Kierkegaard argues the story exists precisely to disturb.

Strengths

  • Honest about the text’s emotional weight
  • Honors the Jewish tradition of wrestling with God

Weaknesses

  • Can leave people without a landing place

Further Reading

  • Soren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling (1843)
  • Shalom Spiegel, The Last Trial (Jewish Lights, 1993)
  • Omri Boehm, The Binding of Isaac: A Religious Model of Disobedience (T&T Clark, 2007)
  • Carol Delaney, Abraham on Trial (Princeton, 1998)

Christological / Typological

Tradition: Patristic / Christian Summary: The Aqedah prefigures the cross: Isaac is the beloved son, the ram is the substitute, Moriah is Calvary.

Isaac carries the wood as Jesus carried the cross. Abraham’s “only son” echoes John 3:16. The ram prefigures substitutionary atonement. Moriah is identified with the Temple Mount (2 Chr 3:1).

Strengths

  • Deeply embedded in Christian tradition
  • The parallels are genuinely striking

Weaknesses

  • Can supersede the Jewish reading
  • Typological reading doesn’t resolve the ethical problem

Further Reading

  • Melito of Sardis, On Pascha (c. 160 AD)
  • Irenaeus, Against Heresies IV.5.4
  • R. W. L. Moberly, The Theology of the Book of Genesis (Cambridge, 2009), ch. 6
  • Hans Urs von Balthasar, Theo-Drama vol. IV (Ignatius, 1994)